Licenses
Choose a license model for your project.
Step 2: Choose an Open License
How about MIT or GPL?
MIT
The MIT License is renowned for its permissiveness, allowing users considerable freedom in how they use, modify, and distribute the software. Its primary strength lies in its simplicity and brevity, which minimizes legal complexity and makes it a popular choice for developers seeking minimal restrictions on their work. The license permits private modification and does not require the same level of copyleft as other licenses, meaning that derivatives can be distributed under different terms. However, this flexibility can also be seen as a weakness, as it allows proprietary forks of projects that may not contribute back to the open-source community.
GPLv3
On the other hand, the GNU General Public License version 3 (GPLv3) is a strong copyleft license that requires any modified versions of the software to be distributed under the same license terms. This ensures that the freedoms to use, modify, and share are preserved in all derivative works, fostering a collaborative environment that benefits the open-source community. The GPLv3 also addresses some modern concerns such as patent retaliation and tivoization, providing a robust legal framework for developers. However, its strict requirements can be a double-edged sword; they may deter some commercial entities from adopting or contributing to GPLv3-licensed projects due to the perceived legal risks and obligations to disclose source code.
Get some guidance
GitHub has a fantastic resource at https://choosealicense.com/ to help you navigate this complicated topic a little more easily.
Additionally, a great resource at https://opensource.guide/ helps you navigate working with open-source projects, so take a quick look.
Last updated